High performance, self-hosted newsletter and mailing list manager with a modern dashboard. Single binary app.

Version:

• listmonk: [eg: v1.0.0]
• OS: Mac Big Sur 11.04

Description of the bug and steps to reproduce: I've installed Listmonk on my Mac around two months ago, and after some back and forth, it has worked well. Today I tried to run it again, but a weird thing happened. First, it ran normally, but the DB was a different one, without any history, campaigns, subscribers, nothing. After re-starting, when I launched it via Terminal, the response was an error message:

[MACHINE NAME] com.docker.docker >> docker compose up
[+] Running 4/0
 ⠿ Container comdockerdocker_demo-db_1   Running                                                                    0.0s
 ⠿ Container comdockerdocker_demo-app_1  Running                                                                    0.0s
 ⠿ Container comdockerdocker_db_1        Created                                                                    0.0s
 ⠿ Container comdockerdocker_app_1       Created                                                                    0.0s
Attaching to app_1, db_1, demo-app_1, demo-db_1
Error response from daemon: driver failed programming external connectivity on endpoint comdockerdocker_db_1 (e2dcf5fd40f60311c43f2f5ca5177bc474eb0b69afd3805e942c5082af0ceb52): Bind for 0.0.0.0:9432 failed: port is already allocated

When I checked on Docker, I saw that there were duplicated instances of Listmonk and Postgres, which I could not remove anyhow:

Could you help me to understand what am I doing wrong? Losing the history of the campaigns would be such a pain.

@mr-karan , I am adding you here following a conversation with Kailash.

Thanks in advance

I see a lot of you guys have Listmonk implemented in a production env. I was wondering how you guys process the soft and hard bounces and also the complaints.

For some reason, I got stuck on how to properly configure config.toml file. It will be so helpful if you can provide a step-by-step guide on how to install Listmonk. Also, there is no demo for a quick look!

Please help!

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

There are a few issues I’ve bumped into while packaging listmonk for debian(-based) systems. I adressed some of those in this PR. Maybe we can use this issue to explore some of the remaining stumbling blocks.

Describe the solution you'd like

• The LAST_COMMIT and VERSION make variables are currently hardcoded to use git for determining their respective values. Package builds often use release tarballs which do not contain any git metadata. The easiest solution is to make the caller determine these values by using the ?= instead of the := assignment in Makefile. This is what I do in my deb packaging. The downside is that every packager has to do that manually. A lot of other projects store release metadata in the repository.
• --new-config should respect the --config option. Pratically speaking: calling listmonk --config /etc/listmonk/mysite.toml --new-config should create the config in /etc/listmonk/mysite.toml instead of storing it as config.toml in the current working directory.
• I know that #326 and #344 already pointed this out, but I want to emphasize it again: I think it would be nice if update checks could be disabled either via the application configuration file or – even better – during build time. It is very common for packagers to disable these checks. There shouldn’t be a need to even render the update-check switch in the frontend in both of these cases.
• I’d be nice to have a default systemd unit file as part of the project that can serve as a basis for package maintainers. systemd provides a lot of options that reduce the attack surface of an application and it would be nice if we could document any practical and applicable options right here, so they’re discoverable for everyone.

As @alerque seems to be packaging listmonk for ArchLinux he can probably weigh in on this discussion as well. Consider it a friendly request for comments :).

I’d be happy to submit pull requests if we reach consensus on solutions for any of the raised issues. Thank you for your time!

Cheers,

Konrad

Hi I am trying listmonk. I see a SMTP connection attempt on my mail server, but nothing after that. How can I debug what's going on on listmonk side, regarding SMTP ? Thank you

As described in #540 it would be great to have a pages for public archives of previous campaigns. #540 was closed when the other part of the feature request was addressed, so I'm opening this issue to keep this part alive :)

I've been spending time on and off on:

• A tiny auth lib to add users and auth after not being able to find a simple enough package. AuthBoss is complex and large.
• A new settings dashboard.
• Scrapping React + AntDesign UI. This was a hard decision, but React + Ant is a mess. Despite having written the frontend, I've been unable to internalise or intuitively navigate the mess that is logic interspersed JSX of Ant Design components. I'm considering VueJS + Buefy (10x smaller than Ant). At least templates will look like templates. Would rather do this now when it's alpha than be locked-in. I am unable to recollect the exact reasons for having made this choice in the first place.

This pull request implements #627 .

The goal here is to expose some basic metrics over a Prometheus endpoint.

~This is very much a draft PR for now. I would expect this to get rebased into something cleaner before it's taken out of draft state.~ Undrafted, yay! \o/

Creating a new issue as was asked for earlier :) I am trying to send out a test mail from campaign screen, it says email sent but does not land in my mail (SES dashboard also says 0 emails sent). SMTP settings are done for the same region the destination email ID belongs to (Mumbai). listmonk dashboard also says 0 msg sent.

Few call outs: I have only 1 SMTP setting enabled (single port) - Do I need to add SMTP settings for all 3 ports? SES account is in sandbox (allows 200 emails to be sent) - can this be the reason? msg rate x concurrency = email rate of SES

Version:

• listmonk: 2.2.0
• OS: Debian 11
• Installation: Single binary started with custom systemd service

Some configuration infos: Bounce handling is listmonk is on and listmonk expects bounces in a pop3 mailbox.

Description of the bug: For all outgoing e-mails sent from listmonk, the "Return-Path" header is always exactly the same as the "From" header. Changing the "Return-Path" via custom headers in the campaign settings does not seem to do anything. Changing other headers such as "Errors-To" works. For us, this means, that currently bounces are not sent back to the correct mailbox. It has to be possible in listmonk to set "Return-Path" to a custom mail address, especially considering that our installation will use many different "From" addresses.

Steps to reproduce:

1. Set global SMTP custom headers [{"Return-Path": "[email protected]"}] according to documentation on https://listmonk.app/docs/bounces/
2. Create a campaign.
3. Set From to [email protected].
4. Send test mail or start campaign.
5. Verify headers in our smtp gateway or in Thunderbird on the receiving end.
6. Header Return-Path is [email protected], which is wrong.

Version:

• listmonk: [eg: v2.0.0]
• OS: [Docker]

Hello

I wanted to set up a pop3 account to handle bounces. The account is running on a mail server, but unfortunately listmonk indicates an error in the log : bounce.go:139: error scanning bounce mailbox: unknown response. Neither -ERR, nor +OK

Any idea what the solution might be? thx for help !

I am using TrackView for tracking views in emails sent via listmonk, as suggested i used TrackView only once in the template also within two curly braces ( {{ TrackView }} ) but I am testing everything in the development environment. How can I resolve this any kind of help will be appreciated

• listmonk: v2.3.0
• OS: Debian

I have been using python requests to submit campaigns to listmonk's API. Everything has been working fine until I decided to include the @TrackLink shorthand appended to each link href in the content body. The full error I am seeing when attempting to preview or edit a campaign that has been created through the API is: {"message":"Error compiling template: error compiling message: template: content:2: bad character U+003D '='"}

The error is also showing up in the listmonk logs and the campaign will not send.

If I open the API generated campaign in listmonk, select "Content", view the HTML source in the editor, click "Format HTML", "Save", then "Save Changes" to the campaign the issue is resolved. The campaign becomes fully functional.

Attached is the "body" value that is returned by the API when the campaign is created. If I remove "@TrackLink" from the hrefs the error goes away. body.txt

Version:

• listmonk: v2.3.0
• OS: Docker Image

Description of the bug and steps to reproduce: I initially setup in AWS SNS to send all even types (Delivery, Send, ...) and I noticed in listmonk Bounces list that emails with delivery status were also marked as bounce. I then changed to only send notification for Bounces.

In the code I don't see any checks for eventType, I think we should add check in code to make sure the eventType is Bounce (and maybe also Complaint?) In sesMail struct, I see notificationType but not eventType where I noticed the Bounce event type.

Payload for notificationType = Delivery

{
  "mail": { ... },
  "delivery": { ... },
  "notificationType": "Delivery"
}

Payload for eventType = Bounce

{
  "mail": { ... },
  "bounce": { ... },
  "eventType": "Bounce"
}

Version:

• listmonk: v2.3.0
• OS: Debian 11u5

Description of the bug and steps to reproduce: I sent myself an e-mail using the SMTP connection test tool (to a Google Workspace mailbox). I get a 5.6.7 SMTP bounce from the Google Workspace servers.

So given the nature of the 5.6.7 error, it's most likely related to the quotes between the sender name, like Listmonk does: "Name" <[email protected]>, since I tried exactly the same e-mail from another client (Evolution) that builds the From: field in the following way: Name <[email protected]> (without any quotes around the sender name) and the e-mail gets through without any issue.

How can I proceed from there? Write a patch?

Thank you in advance.