according to https://github.com/alfiankan/teleterm/issues/14 Literally everybody can access the server through the bot and all bots are public with an @. In terms of functinality the bot is great but you need to add a Whitlist for users

white listing using telegram username on config file. teleterm running using file config.yaml at /home-path/.teleterm/config.yaml. on this feature request the config file will be :

teleterm:
  telegram_token: "xxxxxxxxx"
  shell_executor: "/bin/bash"
  whitelists:
    - sabrina
    - hilda
    - ambross
    - zelda

so only listed users on config file can execute command.

Literally everybody can access the server through the bot and all bots are public with an @. In terms of functinality the bot is great but you need to add a Whitlist for users

Describe the bug it doesnt have a lot of file and video does nat match and represtents the file are missing btw when i try to buid teleterm.go its sayng root@raspberrypi:~/terminal/teleterm/teleterm# go build -o teleterm4 teleterm.go

command-line-arguments

./teleterm.go:6:15: syntax error: unexpected literal 5554722719, expecting ) ./teleterm.go:7:26: syntax error: unexpected :, expecting comma or )

To Reproduce Steps to reproduce the behavior:

1. Go to 'dev/teleterm/teleterm#'
2. Click on 'teleterm.go'
3. Scroll down to '....'
4. See error that -bash: ./1: Permission denied

Desktop (please complete the following information):

• OS: [Rasbian ]
• raspberry 3
• Version [last ]

i realy like the idea what did u make but in rep it needs to fix it out

The bot worked fine on my ubuntu vps but now I'm using debian 11 and cant get it to work.

debian@vps:~$ teleterm-bin -bash: /usr/local/bin/teleterm-bin: Permission denied debian@vps:~$ sudo teleterm-bin sudo: teleterm-bin: command not found

Any suggestions how to fix that?

• [x ] - add shortcut button
• [ x] - delete shortcut button
• [ x] - run command using shortcut
• [ x] - run command full output
• [ x] - run command head output
• [ x] - run command tail output

    > > It would be better to use the user id for whitelist and not username since the user id of your account will never changed. Also some people don't have an unsername

is it possible to get userid without using @userinfobot bot ? you're right about username, but what do you think if we use both username and user id as whitelist ? since username is easily accessible i think, but we still provide possibility to use user id as whitelist

@alfajrimutawadhi @catty-dev

teleterm:
  telegram_token: "xxxxxxxxx"
  shell_executor: "/bin/bash"
  whitelists:
    - @sabrina
    - @hilda
    - @ambross
    - @zelda
    - 783277716
    - 133475712

Sounds like a good solution. Only the official client don't show id's. Forks like telegramX or plus messenger shows them and it makes working with bots much easier. Using username and id for whitelist seems to be the best solution.

Originally posted by @catty-dev in https://github.com/alfiankan/teleterm/issues/15#issuecomment-1366249316